When Microsoft opened its sleek new Cybercrime Centre last month, the
company said it was designed to showcase some of its latest
technologies and to bring together different units that work on fighting
everything from malware to intellectual-property theft.
Now, Microsoft is filing its first case emerging from the work of the Cybercrime Centre team.
It's
now filed a civil lawsuit in the US District Court of Western
Washington against Sichuan Changhong Electric Co, a China-based
manufacturer of household appliances such as refrigerators and TVs.
Microsoft
accuses Changhong of using product keys - a series of numbers and
letters that a user enters into a computer in order to activate
Microsoft software - that were stolen from organisations that had
legitimately purchased licences for the software.
Those
organisations include a US public university, a US public-school
district, a
US-based engineering company and an Asia-based semiconductor
manufacturer, all unidentified in the suit.
Microsoft says it
doesn't know how those product keys were stolen and believes that will
be made clear during the discovery process.
Microsoft contends
that, since 2011, Changhong's employees, contractors or other agents
have activated numerous copies of Microsoft software products using
stolen product-activation keys.
Representatives of Changhong could not immediately be reached for comment.
Microsoft
believes it's the first time a company has used the Computer Fraud and
Abuse Act to go after those allegedly stealing software product keys.
The law prohibits unauthorised access to a protected computer system
such as those used in interstate commerce.
The level of proof
required under that law to show product keys were stolen would not have
been possible even a few years ago, Microsoft says.
It's now
possible, the company says, because of technological advances used in
the field of cyberforensics - the gathering and analysis of digital
evidence and data to prove cases.
The cybercrime team first got suspicious about eight months ago when
they were looking into patterns involving a known stolen product key.
They
traced the key back to an educational institution in the US that had
legitimately purchased licences to use Microsoft's software.
The
cyberforensics team then plotted onto maps where that organisation's
licences were being activated. Those maps showed big spikes in
activation attempts in places far from the US.
They then started looking for "a pattern under the map," said Zoe Krumm, a member of the cyberforensics team.
Microsoft's
analysis showed, for instance, that within short periods of time,
computers controlled by Changhong had tried to activate different
product keys for certain Microsoft programs, such as Office or Project.
Some of the attempts failed, and the user kept trying until he or she
succeeded with a key that Microsoft had not yet blocked.
"That's what I'm looking for," Krumm said. "They try multiple keys within minutes of each other until they find a pass."
Microsoft
says in its lawsuit that its analysis also showed the activation
attempts took place on "numerous devices controlled by Changhong" during
regular business hours in China.
The data collected, along with
data visualisation tools and the work of data scientists and
investigators, "allowed us to know when a company like Changhong has
attempted over 2,000 times to activate unlicensed software with over 200
product keys," said Matt Lundy, Microsoft's assistant general counsel
for the digital-crimes unit.
While the Computer Fraud and Abuse
Act has been used commonly in cases involving malware, "there's a good
reason" the law has most likely not been used in stolen software-product
key cases before, said Rob McKenna, former Washington state attorney
general who's now a partner specialising in technology and intellectual
property with law firm Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe.
"It's the proof problem - collecting the evidence and documenting
that a computer used stolen licence keys to gain unauthorised access to
Microsoft servers " said McKenna, who is not working on this case but
has been briefed on it by Microsoft. He also works with Microsoft on
other cases.
Microsoft is seeking a jury trial and a judgment
barring Changhong from using product keys that it hasn't purchased to
access Microsoft's servers in the future.
It's also seeking an unspecified amount for damages.
0 comments :
Post a Comment